bashdar.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the bashdar.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host bashdar.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Host Lincoln Limited .

the related websites

susu.org en.noreva-laboratoires.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

bashdar pusho ismaeel freelance writer, political analyst\editor, middle east, iraq menu skip to content home about me overview contact how obama’s red line fiasco breathed new life into the syrian regime leave a reply the u.s., u.k. and france’s retaliatory airstrike on april 21, two weeks after alleged chemical attacks by bashar assad’s forces in douma, was to deter the syrian regime or force a change of mood, then it looks like a failure. regime forces are relentlessly continuing their fierce quest to drive out opposition forces in remaining enclaves around damascus. as a team from the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons (opcw) finally arrived in douma on april 17 to investigate the alleged chemical attacks, the u.s. and its allies had long made up their minds and attributed blame to the regime. u.s. president donald trump promised to make assad pay a “big price” for the chemical attacks that left over 40 people dead. however, the fierce rhetoric and threats on social media came well short of eventual military action. while the missile strikes were greater in number than those ordered by washington in april 2017, when western powers were again adamant that only assad could be responsible for the fatal chemical attack in khan sheikoun, the u.s.-led response this time around seemed more sensitive to avoid any action that would incense russia, or worse still, hit russian personnel. this view seems to be confirmed by russian foreign minister sergey lavrov, who stated, “we told them where our red lines were, including the geographical red lines… the results have shown that they haven’t crossed those lines.” trump hailed the operation, predominantly aimed at destroying assad’s chemical weapons development capability, as “mission accomplished,” however, this is where the ironies are hard to ignore. five years after assad brazenly crossed then u.s. president barack obama’s infamous red line on chemical attacks, the fact that u.s. is still reacting to such scenarios says much about the flawed deal in 2013 between washington and moscow that was supposed to see syria dispose of all of its chemical weapon stockpiles in exchange for halting military action. obama clearly set a red line in august 2012 for military intervention in syria when he stated, “we have been very clear to the assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. that would change my calculus. that would change my equation.” yet, just days after assad’s deadly attack in ghouta, obama quickly backtracked and even stated in september 2013, “i didn’t set a red line. the world set a red line.” fast forward to 2018, assad is not only still in power, but also very much in the ascendency with significant support from his russian and iranian allies. trump was critical of obama’s failure to enforce redlines, and vowed that when he set a redline he meant it. this pledge placed trump in a difficult corner after the most recent chemical attack by assad, but u.s has seemingly little appetite for regime change or any greater military campaign that sees it sucked in deeper into the syrian war or thrust into a direct showdown with moscow. the real time for action that would have greatly swayed the syrian war and resulted in a much more rapid settlement of the conflict was in 2013. obama greatly misjudged his shifting red lines and the effects of the so-called deal that would remove assad’s chemical weapon capability. at the time, obama was quick to hail the deal that averted the need for military intervention. meanwhile, former u.s. secretary of state john kerry was equally upbeat, stating in 2014, “with respect to syria, we struck a deal where we got 100 percent of the chemical weapons out.” now, any outcome from the opcw, who cannot attribute blame but only confirm chemical weapons use, will not change the calculus on the ground. the united nations security council is in a state of paralysis from reaching any meaningful diplomatic agreement, let alone agreeing on real action, due to russia’s ardent support for assad. the opcw investigation into the april 2017 attacks had little effect on dissuading assad. ahead of the opcw team’s delayed arrival, there was fierce rhetoric between the u.s. and russia over alleged cover-ups at the site of the attacks. heather nauert, spokeswoman for the u.s. state department, stated, “russian officials have worked with the syrian regime, we believe, to sanitize the locations of the suspected attacks and remove incriminating evidence of chemical weapons use.” however, russia and syria remained resolute that the opposition staged the attacks with the support of the west. either way, russia remains in the driver’s seat in syria and looks to prop up the regime and its strategic interests in the eastern mediterranean at any cost. on the other hand, u.s. policy in syria seems disjointed and unpredictable. just weeks ago, trump vowed that u.s. forces would be withdrawn soon; then subsequent statements from u.s. officials backtracked and indicated a more long-term stay in syria. as for assad, with the firepower of his allies at hand, he will quickly mop up the remaining opposition strongholds around damascus, homs, and beyond. unfortunately, for the long-suffering syrian population, there seems to be no short-term end in sight to the brutal war that has devastated millions of lives. first published: daily sabah this entry was posted in global affairs , syria and tagged assad , obama , trump on may 10, 2018 by admin . international powers scramble to manipulate afrin for geopolitical gains leave a reply as turkish troops and their allies advance in afrin, the besieged canton has become a theatre for regional and global powers to wield influence, extract concessions to boost their goals in syria, and settle scores against old rivals. with the kurdish people’s protection units (ypg) surrounded by turkey, free syrian army (fsa) rebels, regime forces and countless jihadist groups, all actors in the syrian conflict are trying to manipulate the situation to their own advantage. the united states, whose partnership with the ypg was pivotal in driving out the islamic state group from large swathes of syrian territory, decided that afrin was a completely different case to manbij and other territories where it remains active with kurdish forces – as the pentagon did not have forces stationed there. in practice, this was a convenient excuse for us to give concessions to their irate nato allies in ankara, after seeing relations with turkey deteriorate dramatically in recent years. this may sway some sentiment in ankara but is not without its own ramifications. as washington has acknowledged, kurdish forces east of the euphrates have already diverted forces from the fight against is to join the fight against turkish-led forces. us calls have centred on restraint, labelling the operation a “distraction”, but have stopped short of calling for a halt in attacks. more ominously, us indifference over afrin may not be sufficient to appease an increasingly ambitious turkey. turkey already has its eye on manbij as the next target where a sizable contingent of us forces are also present. on his recent visit to turkey to defuse tensions mutually deemed at “crisis point”, us secretary of state rex tillerson reportedly promised a ypg withdrawal east of the euphrates and joint turkish-us patrols in manbij. while details remain unclear, the new us-turkey commitment to “work together” in northern syria could drive a deeper wedge between the us and the kurds that has opened up over afrin. turkey has grave concerns over afrin, kobane and jazira cantons all being controlled by the kurdish ypg, which it sees as an offshoot of the pkk kurdistan workers’ party, which has fought a bloody 34-year insurgency against ankara the undermining of us-kurdish relations is music to ears of moscow

URL analysis for bashdar.co.uk

http://bashdar.co.uk/category/poems/
http://bashdar.co.uk/category/global-economy/
http://bashdar.co.uk/2018/02/regional-alliance-punishing-iraqs-kurds-for-referendum-cannot-last/
http://bashdar.co.uk/2018/02/struggle-against-pkk-needs-multi-pronged-approach/#respond
http://bashdar.co.uk/2018/01/trumps-decree-pours-further-fuel-on-jerusalem-fire/
http://bashdar.co.uk/category/syria/
http://bashdar.co.uk/2017/08/us-sanctions-strain-ties-with-russia-threaten-cooperation-on-key-issues/#respond
http://bashdar.co.uk/category/iraq/
http://bashdar.co.uk/contact/
http://bashdar.co.uk/2018/02/iraqi-kurds-remain-key-ally-for-turkey-in-volatile-region/#respond
http://bashdar.co.uk/category/u-s-foreign-policy/
http://bashdar.co.uk/2018/01/trumps-decree-pours-further-fuel-on-jerusalem-fire/#respond
http://bashdar.co.uk/2018/02/regional-alliance-punishing-iraqs-kurds-for-referendum-cannot-last/#respond
http://bashdar.co.uk/category/global-affairs/
http://bashdar.co.uk/2017/08/can-turkish-opposition-overcome-nationalist-stigma-ally-with-kurds/#respond
alaraby.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "bashdar.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 110 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 13:45:37 31-Aug-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS bashdar.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME bashdar.co.uk

NSERVER

  NS68.1AND1.CO.UK 217.160.81.173

  NS67.1AND1.CO.UK 217.160.80.173

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .